An honorable figure passed through a vision, as well as a loved one like my older brother, who had the privilege to speak.
Maulana Mahmud was writing history to Madani and complaining to him why you were doing "Desh Desh".
He said: Why are you forgetting the Government's commitment to repeal India? The current government has abolished Article 370, misappropriated it by not responding to the UN resolution, disobeying the Shimla Treaty.
If you have collected at least some of the information here, like you, you know that after the Kashmir Constituent Assembly was declared an integral part of India in 1956, 1972 Kofi, who visited India and Pakistan in 2001 after Indira Gandhi and Sheikh Abdullah's agreement in 1975, after the United Nations was dismissed by both India and Pakistan in the Shimla pact. Annan's UN resolutions were termed as "mere proposals" and in 2003 by Pakistan's head of state, the UN Ardadun the express consent to the shore, UN referendum is the resolution of today is to understand how ridiculous this process is referred to in 2019 as "historic qualification"!
Fazil has also complained to Mahmud why you do not ask the government to violate the "Shimla Agreement". One of the lines of the 1972 Shimla Agreement was that India and Pakistan would resolve their problems with the sole and only dialogue. Now, what is the status of the Shimla Treaty after the arrival of Pakistan's army in Kargil in 1999 to "negotiate"? When a covenant is violated by self-pity, it is called the "Glory of the Charismatic Creator".
It is reasonable to declare the removal of Section 370 as a distraction from the Kashmiris on the basis of its procedure, and therefore, Mahmud said on TV 370 consistently that "we may have differences but National Integrity We are in favor of the country ", and these" differences "have been mentioned in the unanimous resolution that was approved earlier.
But the matter is not yet complete, the real question remains. The real question is, "Why are you doing Desh?". Just go up to get an answer, who are the parties to the two "treaties" whose "defeat" is overlooked? India and Pakistan are. If India, in fact, has broken a covenant, to whom has it been committed? From the third Pakistan. Why did you stand in advocacy for this third party? If you still want to get an opinion after the resolution of the remarks is meaningless and ineffective, it simply means that you are no longer trusted on "Kashmir is an integral part of India". Born.
Yes, you have to be right, Mahmud Madani has to indulge in this storm of misinformation, poor consciousness and unconscious emotions. If they don't, you know what will happen? On the outside, it is a failed diplomatic lobby trying to launch a gun on the shoulders of Muslims, whose Prime Minister has said in a public rally that "India's 20 million Muslims will take the path of extremism". Statements, and on the inside it will be the unconsciousness of the intellectual nation that you just witnessed. Exactly the same two elements - external intervention and internal indiscriminate extremism - have destroyed Kashmir, and thankfully these two elements will destroy you too!
Lastly, the restoration of rights, conditions, cultural identity and social dignity for the Kashmiri people has raised the voice of Mahmud Madani, even five days ago, the voice of which no one except the Indian Express has heard. Even our own people probably did not want to hear that Mahmud Madani had habitually told the bitter truth that the people of Kashmir are getting stuck in two pits of the mill. The New York Times has presented with such intensity that many people may not be able to look in the mirror. The essence of this report is that the separatists have regularly put strict social restrictions in place to prevent the Kashmir situation from coming to normal, even as they refrain from firing on the Kashmiri people.
Maulana Mahmud was writing history to Madani and complaining to him why you were doing "Desh Desh".
He said: Why are you forgetting the Government's commitment to repeal India? The current government has abolished Article 370, misappropriated it by not responding to the UN resolution, disobeying the Shimla Treaty.
If you have collected at least some of the information here, like you, you know that after the Kashmir Constituent Assembly was declared an integral part of India in 1956, 1972 Kofi, who visited India and Pakistan in 2001 after Indira Gandhi and Sheikh Abdullah's agreement in 1975, after the United Nations was dismissed by both India and Pakistan in the Shimla pact. Annan's UN resolutions were termed as "mere proposals" and in 2003 by Pakistan's head of state, the UN Ardadun the express consent to the shore, UN referendum is the resolution of today is to understand how ridiculous this process is referred to in 2019 as "historic qualification"!
Fazil has also complained to Mahmud why you do not ask the government to violate the "Shimla Agreement". One of the lines of the 1972 Shimla Agreement was that India and Pakistan would resolve their problems with the sole and only dialogue. Now, what is the status of the Shimla Treaty after the arrival of Pakistan's army in Kargil in 1999 to "negotiate"? When a covenant is violated by self-pity, it is called the "Glory of the Charismatic Creator".
It is reasonable to declare the removal of Section 370 as a distraction from the Kashmiris on the basis of its procedure, and therefore, Mahmud said on TV 370 consistently that "we may have differences but National Integrity We are in favor of the country ", and these" differences "have been mentioned in the unanimous resolution that was approved earlier.
But the matter is not yet complete, the real question remains. The real question is, "Why are you doing Desh?". Just go up to get an answer, who are the parties to the two "treaties" whose "defeat" is overlooked? India and Pakistan are. If India, in fact, has broken a covenant, to whom has it been committed? From the third Pakistan. Why did you stand in advocacy for this third party? If you still want to get an opinion after the resolution of the remarks is meaningless and ineffective, it simply means that you are no longer trusted on "Kashmir is an integral part of India". Born.
Yes, you have to be right, Mahmud Madani has to indulge in this storm of misinformation, poor consciousness and unconscious emotions. If they don't, you know what will happen? On the outside, it is a failed diplomatic lobby trying to launch a gun on the shoulders of Muslims, whose Prime Minister has said in a public rally that "India's 20 million Muslims will take the path of extremism". Statements, and on the inside it will be the unconsciousness of the intellectual nation that you just witnessed. Exactly the same two elements - external intervention and internal indiscriminate extremism - have destroyed Kashmir, and thankfully these two elements will destroy you too!
Lastly, the restoration of rights, conditions, cultural identity and social dignity for the Kashmiri people has raised the voice of Mahmud Madani, even five days ago, the voice of which no one except the Indian Express has heard. Even our own people probably did not want to hear that Mahmud Madani had habitually told the bitter truth that the people of Kashmir are getting stuck in two pits of the mill. The New York Times has presented with such intensity that many people may not be able to look in the mirror. The essence of this report is that the separatists have regularly put strict social restrictions in place to prevent the Kashmir situation from coming to normal, even as they refrain from firing on the Kashmiri people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment